首页> 外文OA文献 >Social Democracy or Corporate Libertarianism? Conflicting Media Policy Narratives in the Wake of Market Failure
【2h】

Social Democracy or Corporate Libertarianism? Conflicting Media Policy Narratives in the Wake of Market Failure

机译:社会民主主义还是企业自由主义?市场失灵后矛盾的媒体政策叙述

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Assuming that crucial public services should not be left entirely to market-driven forces, American policymakers attempted to establish safeguards for news media. An examination of conflicting narratives within postwar policy debates suggests that the US evaded this path largely because of a concerted backlash—often in the form of red-baiting—encouraged by threatened newspaper and broadcast industries. Many lessons, parallels, and forgotten antecedents for current American media policy can be drawn from the postwar 1940s. Thus, it is instructive to explore how these earlier debates were framed, particularly in response to what might be referred to as ‘‘market failure.’’ Given the worsening journalism crisis and other persistent media policy challenges, this analysis of market failure holds much contemporary relevance.
机译:假定关键的公共服务不应完全留给市场驱动的力量,美国决策者试图为新闻媒体建立保障措施。对战后政策辩论中相互矛盾的叙述的研究表明,美国之所以逃避了这条道路,主要是因为受到报刊和广播业威胁的共同抵制(通常以红色诱饵的形式)。当前美国媒体政策的许多教训,相似之处和被遗忘的先例可以从战后的1940年代汲取。因此,探索这些早期辩论的框架是有启发性的,特别是针对可能被称为“市场失灵”的情况。鉴于新闻危机的恶化和其他持续的媒体政策挑战,这种对市场失灵的分析在很大程度上当代意义。

著录项

  • 作者

    Pickard, Victor;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号